[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4088-4098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00787]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
RIN 0991-ZA52
Making Permanent Regulatory Flexibilities Provided During the
COVID-19 Public Health Emergency by Exempting Certain Medical Devices
From Premarket Notification Requirements; Request for Information,
Research, Analysis, and Public Comment on Opportunities for Further
Science and Evidence-Based Reform of Section 510(k) Program
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice; request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: To provide Americans with expanded access to certain medical
devices to respond to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, FDA issued
guidance documents providing numerous regulatory flexibilities,
including a temporary waiver of premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. For seven
class I devices for which 510(k) premarket review as temporarily waived
during the PHE, the Department of Health and Human Services is
permanently exempting those seven (7) class I devices from the 510(k)
requirement and is also proposing to exempt an additional 83 class II
devices and 1 unclassified device class from the 510(k) requirement,
for which premarket review had also been waived during the PHE. The
Department is soliciting the public's views on whether premarket review
should be permanently waived for some or all of these 83 devices and
views on ways to improve the 510(k) premarket notification program.
DATES: Part III.A of this Notice shall be effective immediately on
publication in the Federal Register. To be considered, responses and
comments related to Part III.B of this Notice must be received
electronically, within sixty days of publication in the Federal
Register as provided below. The Department will consider information
submitted by the public in response to Part IV of this Notice on a
rolling basis, and until further notice.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received will be posted to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For
access to the docket to read background documents or comments received,
go to http://www.regulations.gov. Comments must be identified by 0991-
ZA52. Because of staff and resource limitations, all comments must be
submitted electronically to www.regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a
comment'' instructions.
Warning: Do not include any personally identifiable information
(such as name, address, or other contact information) or confidential
business information that you do not want publicly disclosed. All
comments may be posted on the internet and can be retrieved by most
internet search engines. No deletions, modifications, or redactions
will be made to comments received.
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including personally identifiable or confidential business information
that is included in a comment. You may wish to consider limiting the
amount of personal information that you provide in any voluntary public
comment submission you make. HHS may withhold information provided in
comments from public viewing that it determines may impact the privacy
of an individual or is offensive. For additional information, please
read the Privacy Act notice that is available via the link in the
footer of http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on
that website to view the public comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Barry, 200 Independence Ave. SW,
Washington, DC 20201; or by email at daniel.barry@hhs.gov; or by
telephone at 1-877-696-6775.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Administration is committed to creating
a data-based regulatory process that appropriately balances benefits
and costs. Consistent with the President's executive order on COVID-19
regulatory flexibilities, and Congress' direction in the 21st Century
Cures Act, the Department is issuing this Notice to permanently exempt
or proposing to permanently exempt certain class I and class II medical
devices from the premarket notification requirement in section 510(k)
of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 360(k). Under this
notice, the Department is immediately making permanent the exemption of
7 class I device classes from the section 510(k) requirement and
proposes to exempt an additional 84 class II and unclassified device
classes from the same requirement on a permanent basis. These 91
devices were all subject a 510(k) waiving during the PHE.
I. Background
A. Statutory Framework
Under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), medical devices
are placed ``in three categories based on the risk that they pose to
the public.'' \1\ Class I devices, products ``that present no
unreasonable risk of illness or injury,'' \2\ are subject to general
controls. FD&C Act 513(a)(1)(A), 21 U.S.C.
[[Page 4089]]
360c(a)(1)(A). Class II devices are ``potentially more harmful'' than
class I devices, and ``must comply with federal performance regulations
known as `special controls.''' \3\ Class III devices carry the highest
risk, in that they are for ``use in supporting or sustaining human life
or for a use which is of substantial importance in preventing
impairment of human health, or present[ ] a potential unreasonable risk
of illness or injury.'' FD&C Act 513(a)(1)(C)(ii)(I)-(II), 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(C)(ii)(I)-(II).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 476 (1996).
\2\ Id. at 476-77.
\3\ Lohr, 518 U.S. at 477; see also FD&C Act 513(a)(1)(B), 21
U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Medical devices are generally subject to FDA premarket review in
one of two forms. The first is premarket approval (PMA) review under
section 515 of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 360e. This form of ``rigorous''
review, analogous to FDA review of a New Drug Application for a ``new
drug,'' requires manufacturers to ``submit detailed information
regarding the safety and efficacy of their devices, which the FDA then
reviews.'' \4\ During the mid-1990s, FDA reported spending ``an average
of 1,200 hours on each [PMA] submission,'' \5\ though the time for
review has likely increased since Lohr was decided.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Lohr, 518 U.S. at 477.
\5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The second form of premarket review is the premarket notification
process, which is commonly referred to as the 510(k) process after
section 510(k) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 360(k). Generally, under the
510(k) process, a device that is ``substantially equivalent'' to
another legally marketed predicate device is ``cleared'' (as opposed to
``approved'') \6\ by FDA for legal marketing in the United States. See
FD&C Act 510(k), 513(i), 21 U.S.C. 360(k), 360c(i). FDA regulations
specify the required contents of 510(k) notifications, including
labeling, intended use, and clinical and performance data requirements.
21 CFR 807.92. FDA previously reported requiring ``an average of only
20 hours'' to complete a 510(k) review,\7\ which would be around 60
times less than the time required for PMA review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 21 CFR 807.97 (providing that ``determination by the
Commissioner that the device intended for introduction into
commercial distribution is substantially equivalent'' to a predicate
device ``does not in any way denote official approval of the
device'').
\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Obtaining either a PMA approval or a 510(k) clearance to legally
market a medical device is expensive and time-consuming. According to a
2010 survey of medical device companies, ``the average total cost from
concept to approval [of a PMA device] was approximately $94 million,
with $75 million spent on stages linked to the FDA.'' \8\ For PMAs,
survey respondents reported ``that it actually took them an average of
54 months to work with the FDA from first communication to approval.''
\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Josh Makower, Aabed Meer & Lyn Denend, FDA Impact on U.S.
Medical Technology Innovation: A Survey of Over 200 Medical Device
Companies, at 7 (Nov. 2010), https://www.medtecheurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/01112010_FDA-impact-on-US-medical-technology-innovation_Backgrounder.pdf. During a 2011 hearing before
a House subcommittee, the Director for the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health (CDRH) raised concerns regarding the methodology
used in this study. FDA Medical Device Approval: Is There a Better
Way?, Hearing Before the H. Subcomm. on Health Care, District of
Columbia, Census and the National Archives, 112th Cong. 29 (2011)
(hereinafter the ``2011 Hearing''). The CDRH Director's criticisms
largely focused on the report's comparison of FDA's regulation of
medical devices to the European Union's regulatory system. The CDRH
Director otherwise acknowledged that FDA does not ``do cost analyses
for what the manufacturers are doing'' and that the agency ``would
not know of the total cost to a particular company.'' Id. at 32.
Here, the Department is citing this study for 510(k) cost and time
estimates, not for purposes of comparing the U.S. and E.U. medical
device regulatory systems.
\9\ Id. at 22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While 510(k) devices trod a swifter, less expensive path to market
than PMA devices do, the same survey found that ``the average total
cost for participants to bring a low-to-moderate-risk 510(k) product
from concept to clearance was approximately $31 million, with $24
million spent on FDA dependent and/or related activities.'' \10\
Respondents also reported ``an average of 10 months from first filing
to clearance'' for a 510(k) device.\11\ The survey authors acknowledged
that respondents ``were most likely those companies working on
innovative, new medical technologies that required clinical data to get
through the FDA rather those seeking relatively simple extensions to
low-risk, ubiquitous product lines already in existence.'' \12\
Nevertheless, the survey found the average total cost connected to the
``Process of Obtaining [a] 510(k) [clearance]'' to be more than $4
million per product.\13\ Even if these estimates overstate costs by a
factor of ten, a firm could still spend $2.4 million ``on FDA dependent
and/or related activities,'' to include an estimated $400,000 on the
510(k) clearance process itself. Similarly, even if the survey
respondents overstated delays, and the actual time were much closer to
FDA's goal date of 90 days for review, it is undisputed that the 510(k)
clearance process delays a device's introduction to the market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Id. at 7.
\11\ Id. at 22.
\12\ Id. at 29, fig. 10.
\13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A 2014 report on antibacterial products produced for the Assistant
Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) contains similar findings.
The report noted that, to conduct a pivotal clinical study to support a
510(k) submission for a MRSA point-of-care diagnostic, a manufacturer
could expect to spend ``from a low of $250,000 to as high as $4.0
million.'' \14\ The report estimated the cost to prepare and submit a
510(k) application ``at $100,000'' while acknowledging the amount
``could be highly variable depending on device characteristics.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Aylin Sertkaya et al., Analytical Framework for Examining
the Value of Antibacterial Products, at 5-3 (Apr. 15, 2014).
\15\ Id. at 5-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These costs are barriers to new market entrants. To the extent
imposing the section 510(k) premarket notification on a device does not
create corresponding safety and efficacy benefits for Americans, those
barriers are unjustified. Such barriers warrant scrutiny, particularly
when market incumbents have an interest in retaining them. As FDA
acknowledged in a 1975 proposed rule in the analogous context of drug
approvals, ``the manufacturer who holds the `pioneer' NDA for a drug
may well have an economic interest in retaining the new drug status of
that drug'' because ``[a]s long as either a full or an abbreviated NDA
is required, entry into the market place, and thus increased
competition is impeded.'' \16\ FDA noted its belief ``that it was not
the intention of Congress that section 505 of the [FD&C Act] would be
used as an economic trade barrier.'' \17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 40 FR 26142, 26148 (June 20, 1975).
\17\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 4090]]
Congress has taken action to ensure that the section 510(k)
premarket notification process does not create undue economic barriers
for new medical devices. Under the FD&C Act, the Secretary is
authorized to exempt class I and II medical devices from the 510(k)
requirement if the Secretary finds those devices ``no longer require[ ]
a report under section [510](k) to provide reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness.'' FD&C Act 510(l)(2), 510(m)(1)(A)(i), 21
U.S.C. 360(l)(2), 360(m)(1)(A)(i). Congress did this in part to ``allow
the Secretary to expend limited premarket review resources on
potentially risky and technologically advanced devices'' so that ``the
public continues to be adequately protected and will still benefit from
the earlier availability of new products.'' \18\ In section 3054 of the
21st Century Cures Act, Public Law 114-255, 130 Stat. 1033, 1126-27
(Dec. 13, 2016), Congress imposed additional requirements on the
Secretary to take action to affirmatively review class I and II devices
to determine whether they are exempt from the 510(k) requirement. This
Notice is responsive to these previous mandates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ H.R. Conf. Rep. 105-399, at 96 (1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Waiver of Premarket Notification Requirement During COVID-19 PHE
Beginning in March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 Public Health
Emergency (PHE), FDA issued a series of guidance documents designed to
provide the private sector with regulatory flexibility to meet the
sudden, increased need for personal protective equipment, disinfectant
products, and other devices to combat the pandemic. The table below
presents the various guidance documents issued in April 2020 to assist
in the response to the PHE.
Table 1--List of FDA Medical Device Enforcement Policies Responsive to
PHE
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title of guidance Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enforcement Policy for Clinical Electronic April 2020.
Thermometers During the Coronavirus Disease
2019 (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency.
Enforcement Policy for Imaging Systems During April 2020.
the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Public Health Emergency.
Enforcement Policy for Face Masks and May 2020.
Respirators During the Coronavirus Disease
(COVID-19) Public Health Emergency (Revised).
Enforcement Policy for Gowns, Other Apparel, March 2020.
and Gloves During the Coronavirus Disease
(COVID-19) Public Health Emergency.
Enforcement Policy for Sterilizers, March 2020.
Disinfectant Devices, and Air Purifiers
During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-
19) Public Health Emergency.
Enforcement Policy for Digital Health Devices April 2020.
For Treating Psychiatric Disorders During
the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Public Health Emergency.
Enforcement Policy for Extracorporeal April 2020.
Membrane Oxygenation and Cardiopulmonary
Bypass Devices During the Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Public Health
Emergency.
Enforcement Policy for Infusion Pumps and April 2020.
Accessories During the Coronavirus Disease
2019 (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency.
Enforcement Policy for Non-Invasive Fetal and April 2020.
Maternal Monitoring Devices Used to Support
Patient Monitoring During the Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Public Health
Emergency.
Enforcement Policy for Non-Invasive Remote March 2020 (original).
Monitoring Devices Used to Support Patient June 2020 (revised).
Monitoring During the Coronavirus Disease- October 2020 (revised).
2019 (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency
(Revised).
Enforcement Policy for Remote Digital April 2020.
Pathology Devices During the Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Public Health
Emergency.
Enforcement Policy for Remote Ophthalmic April 2020.
Assessment and Monitoring Devices During the
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Public
Health Emergency.
Enforcement Policy for Ventilators and March 2020.
Accessories and Other Respiratory Devices
During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-
19) Public Health Emergency.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As FDA explained in its clinical thermometer guidance, FDA provided
these flexibilities to ``ensure the availability of equipment that
might offer some benefit to health care providers and the general
public during the public health emergency.'' \19\ To that end, among
other things, FDA announced that the agency ``does not intend to object
to the distribution and use of clinical thermometers that are not
currently 510(k) cleared.'' \20\ Some of the flexibilities, such as
those extended to remote patient monitoring, have helped facilitate
telemedicine during the PHE. FDA extended similar flexibility to
additional devices in other guidance documents shown in Table 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ FDA, Enforcement Policy for Clinical Electronic
Thermometers During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Public
Health Emergency, at 3 (Apr. 2020), https://www.fda.gov/media/136698/download.
\20\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. HHS' Review of 510(k) Premarket Notification Flexibilities
On May 19, 2020, the President issued Executive Order No. 13924,
instructing ``[t]he heads of all agencies'' to ``review any regulatory
standards that they have temporarily rescinded, suspended, modified, or
waived during the public health emergency,'' in order to ``determine
which, if any, would promote economic recovery if made permanent.''
\21\ Further, Congress already instructed the Secretary to consider
whether to exempt class I and II devices from the section 510(k)
requirement ``at least once every 5 years.'' FDCA 510(l)(2),
510(m)(1)(A), 21 U.S.C. 360(l)(2), 360(m)(1)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 85 FR 31353, 31356 (May 22, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with the President's executive order, and Congress'
direction in the 21st Century Cures Act, the Department conducted a
data-driven review to determine whether temporary waiver of the section
510(k) premarket notification requirement for some devices during the
PHE should be made permanent. The flexibilities given by FDA during the
PHE presented the Department with a unique opportunity to analyze the
adverse event records of
[[Page 4091]]
devices in periods of time with and without the premarket notification
requirement. In view of this, the overarching question for HHS was
whether premarket notification provided corresponding safety and
efficacy benefits. Below the Department describes the methodology for
its review and the results of the same.
A. Methodology
HHS first reviewed the thirteen FDA guidance documents listed in
Table 1 to determine which device types are subject to those
enforcement policies. The Department identified 221 unique device
types. HHS analyzed those device types using FDA's Product Code
Database \22\ to determine how many of those devices require premarket
review. Of those 221 device types, the Department determined that 5
require a PMA, 29 are exempt from the 510(k) requirement, 3 are
marketed subject to FDA's enforcement discretion, and 184 require
510(k) clearance prior to marketing. Of the 184 devices types that
would require 510(k) clearance without the guidance documents list in
Table 1, 10 are class I devices, 173 are class II devices, and 1 is
unclassified. These 184 devices are referred to collectively in this
Notice as the ``Review Devices.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ FDA, Product Classification Database, https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/classify-your-medical-device/product-code-classification-database.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA maintains a publicly available adverse event reporting database
called the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database or
MAUDE. MAUDE ``houses [medical device reports or] MDRs submitted to the
FDA by mandatory reports (manufacturers, importers and device user
facilities) and voluntary reporters such as health care professionals,
patients and consumers.'' \23\ Like any ``passive surveillance
system,'' MAUDE has ``limitations, including the potential submission
of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, or biased data,'' which means
``incidence or prevalence of an event cannot be determined from this
reporting system alone due to under-reporting of events, inaccuracies
in reports, lack of verification that the device caused the reported
event, and lack of information about frequency of device use.'' \24\
Even with the system's limitations, MAUDE is an important source of
data. FDA has previously used data from MAUDE to inform the agency's
decision making.\25\ Products liability plaintiffs also make use of the
database.\26\ As the CDRH Director previously explained to Congress,
systems like MAUDE set the United States apart from jurisdictions like
the European Union that ``do not have publicly available centralized
data base[s] for that kind of information.'' \27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ FDA, MAUDE--Manufacturer and User Facility Device
Experience, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/search.cfm.
\24\ Id.
\25\ E.g., 85 FR 70003, 70006 (Dec. 20, 2019).
\26\ See Patrick J. McGrather, The FDA's MAUDE: Useful Insights
for Medical Devices (Oct. 31, 2017), https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/committees/mass-torts/practice/2017/manufacture-and-user-facility-device-experience/.
\27\ 2011 Hearing at 30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this review, the Department performed searches of the Review
Devices in FDA's online searchable MAUDE database. Updated on a monthly
basis, the online ``searchable database data contains the last 10
year's data'' of reports ``on medical devices which may have
malfunctioned or caused a death or serious injury.'' \28\ HHS entered
the three-letter product code for each Review Device into the online
MAUDE database. HHS then collected data on the number of reports for
each Review Device from November 1, 2010 to November 30, 2020,
tabulating the reports from November 1, 2010 to the beginning of the
PHE, and for the time period subsequent the beginning of the PHE to
November 30, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ FDA, Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience
Database--(MAUDE), https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/mandatory-reporting-requirements-manufacturers-importers-and-device-user-facilities/manufacturer-and-user-facility-device-experience-database-maude.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Results
Of the 184 Review Devices, HHS found there were 120 or more MAUDE
reports for 74 devices and less than 100 MAUDE reports for the 110
other devices during the last ten years. This means roughly 60% of the
Review Devices have less than 100 MAUDE reports over the last ten
years. Of those 110 devices, 35 devices had no MAUDE reports from
November 1, 2010 to November 30, 2020. Those 35 devices are shown in
Table 2 below.
Table 2--Review Devices With Zero Adverse Event Reports in MAUDE for the Time Period November 1, 2010 to
November 30, 2020
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section in 21
Device description Device class Product code CFR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powder-Free Polychloroprene Patient I.............................. OPC................... 880.6250
Examination Glove.
Ventilator, Continuous, Minimal II............................. NQY................... 868.5895
Ventilatory Support, Home Use.
Airway Monitoring System............... II............................. OQU................... 868.5730
Impedance Measuring Device Utilizing II............................. PNV................... 868.1840
Oscillation Techniques.
Gauge, Pressure, Coronary, II............................. DXS................... 870.4310
Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
Valve, Pressure Relief, Cardiopulmonary II............................. MNJ................... 870.4400
Bypass.
Oximeter, Tissue Saturation, II............................. NMD................... 870.2700
Reprocessed.
Multivariate Vital Signs Index......... II............................. PLB................... 870.2300
Electrocardiograph Software For Over- II............................. QDA................... 870.2345
The-Counter Use.
Sterilizer, Dry Heat................... II............................. KMH................... 880.6870
Check Valve, Retrograde Flow (In-Line). II............................. MJF................... 880.5440
Intravascular Administration Set, II............................. OKL................... 880.5445
Automated Air Removal System.
Neuraxial Administration Set-- II............................. PYR................... 880.5440
Intrathecal Delivery.
High Level Disinfection Reprocessing II............................. PSW................... 892.1570
Instrument For Ultrasonic Transducers,
Liquid.
Pediatric/Child Facemask............... II............................. OXZ................... 878.4040
Normalizing Quantitative II............................. OLU................... 882.1400
Electroencephalograph Software.
Computerized Cognitive Assessment Aid.. II............................. PKQ................... 882.1470
Physiological Signal Based Seizure II............................. POS................... 882.1580
Monitoring System.
Computerized Behavioral Therapy Device II............................. PWE................... 882.5801
For Psychiatric Disorders.
Monitor, Phonocardiographic, Fetal..... II............................. HFP................... 884.2640
Monitor, Cardiac, Fetal................ II............................. KXN................... 884.2600
Digital Pathology Display.............. II............................. PZZ................... 864.3700
Digital Pathology Image Viewing And II............................. QKQ................... 864.3700
Management Software.
[[Page 4092]]
System, Imaging, Holography, Acoustic.. II............................. NCS................... 892.1550
Lung Computed Tomography System, II............................. OEB................... 892.2050
Computer-Aided Detection.
Chest X-Ray Computer Aided Detection... II............................. OMJ................... 892.2050
Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Software II............................. POK................... 892.2060
For Lesions Suspicious For Cancer.
Radiological Computer-Assisted Triage II............................. QAS................... 892.2080
And Notification Software.
Radiological Computer Assisted II............................. QBS................... 892.2090
Detection/Diagnosis Software For
Fracture.
Radiological Computer Assisted II............................. QDQ................... 892.2090
Detection/Diagnosis Software For
Lesions Suspicious For Cancer.
Radiological Computer-Assisted II............................. QFM................... 892.2080
Prioritization Software For Lesions.
X-Ray Angiographic Imaging Based II............................. QHA................... 892.1600
Coronary Vascular Simulation Software
Device.
Automated Radiological Image Processing II............................. QIH................... 892.2050
Software.
Image Acquisition And/Or Optimization II............................. QJU................... 892.2100
Guided By Artificial Intelligence.
Apparatus, Vestibular Analysis......... Unclassified................... LXV................... N/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another 43 devices had no reports in MAUDE following declaration of
the PHE, and the waiver of the 510(k) premarket notification
requirement, with anywhere from 1 to 86 reports in MAUDE prior to the
PHE for those same devices. For the ten-year period spanning November
1, 2010 to November 30, 2020, there were a total of 637 reports in
MAUDE associated with theses 43 devices listed in Table 3.1. This
equates to about 1.5 MAUDE reports per year per device. Table 3.1 below
shows each device with the corresponding number of adverse events
before and after the PHE.
Table 3.1--Review Devices with Zero Adverse Events Post-PHE and 86 or Fewer Adverse Events Pre-PHE in MAUDE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAUDE events
Section in MAUDE events Post-PHE to
Device description Device class Product code 21 CFR November 1, November 30,
2010 to PHE 2020
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patient Examination Glove, I............... LZC............ 880.6250 46 0
Specialty.
Radiation Attenuating Medical I............... OPH............ 880.6250 1 0
Glove.
Powder-Free Non-Natural Rubber I............... OPA............ 878.4460 1 0
Latex Surgeon's Gloves.
Powder-Free Guayle Rubber I............... OIG............ 880.6250 2 0
Examination Glove.
Latex Patient Examination Glove. I............... LYY............ 880.6250 48 0
Meter, Peak Flow, Spirometry.... II.............. BZH............ 868.1860 27 0
Monitor, Apnea, Facility Use.... II.............. FLS............ 868.2377 86 0
Monitor, Apnea, Home Use........ II.............. NPF............ 868.2377 41 0
Oximeter, Reprocessed........... II.............. NLF............ 870.2700 65 0
Stethoscope, Electronic......... II.............. DQD............ 870.1875 2 0
Defoamer, Cardiopulmonary Bypass II.............. DTP............ 870.4230 4 0
Filter, Blood, Cardiotomy II.............. JOD............ 870.4270 2 0
Suction Line, Cardiopulmonary
Bypass.
Detector, Bubble, II.............. KRL............ 870.4205 44 0
Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
Cpb Check Valve, Retrograde II.............. MJJ............ 870.4400 12 0
Flow, In-Line.
Sterilizer, Ethylene-Oxide Gas.. II.............. FLF............ 880.6860 29 0
Cabinet, Ethylene-Oxide Gas II.............. FLI............ 880.6100 2 0
Aerator.
Purifier, Air, Ultraviolet, II.............. FRA............ 880.6500 1 0
Medical.
Cleaner, Air, Medical II.............. FRF............ 880.5045 7 0
Recirculating.
Controller, Infusion, II.............. LDR............ 880.5725 27 0
Intravascular, Electronic.
Cleaners, Medical Devices....... II.............. MDZ............ 880.6992 5 0
Percutaneous, Implanted, Long- II.............. OMF............ 880.5970 9 0
Term Intravascular Catheter
Accessory For Catheter Position.
N95 Respirator With II.............. ORW............ 880.6260 1 0
Antimicrobial/Antiviral Agent
For Use By The General Public
In Public Health Medical
Emergencies.
Two Or More Sterilant Sterilizer II.............. PJJ............ 880.6860 6 0
High Level Disinfection II.............. OUJ............ 892.1570 3 0
Reprocessing Instrument For
Ultrasonic Transducers, Mist.
Gown, Patient................... II.............. FYB............ 878.4040 1 0
Surgical Mask With Antimicrobial/ II.............. OUK............ 878.4040 1 0
Antiviral Agent.
Cerebral Oximeter............... II.............. QEM............ 870.2700 2 0
Device, Sleep Assessment........ II.............. LEL............ 882.5050 4 0
Standard Polysomnograph With II.............. OLV............ 882.1400 9 0
Electroencephalograph.
Source Localization Software For II.............. OLX............ 882.1400 2 0
Electroencephalograph Or
Magnetoencephalograph.
Automatic Event Detection II.............. OLZ............ 882.1400 1 0
Software For Polysomnograph
With Electroencephalograph.
Amplitude-Integrated II.............. OMA............ 882.1400 1 0
Electroencephalograph.
[[Page 4093]]
Automatic Event Detection II.............. OMB............ 882.1400 4 0
Software For Full-Montage
Electroencephalograph.
Burst Suppression Detection II.............. ORT............ 882.1400 1 0
Software For
Electroencephalograph.
Monitor, Heart Rate, Fetal, II.............. HEL............ 884.2660 12 0
Ultrasonic.
Transducer, Ultrasonic, II.............. HGL............ 884.2960 6 0
Obstetric.
Uterine Electromyographic II.............. OSP............ 884.2720 3 0
Monitor.
Tonometer, Ac-Powered........... II.............. HKX............ 886.1930 1 0
Tonometer, Manual............... II.............. HKY............ 886.1930 8 0
Automated Digital Image Manual II.............. OEO............ 864.1860 1 0
Interpretation Microscope.
System, X-Ray, Tomographic...... II.............. IZF............ 892.1740 35 0
Analyzer, Medical Image......... II.............. MYN............ 892.2070 1 0
C-Arm Fluoroscopic X-Ray System. II.............. RCC............ 892.1650 73 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department further analyzed the details of the MAUDE reports
listed in Table 3.1. For the 5 class I glove devices listed, there were
98 reports. As shown in Table 3.2 below, after review of the detailed
narratives for those 98 reports, they can be broken down into eight
categories.
Table 3.2--MAUDE Report Breakdown for 5 Class I Devices in Table 3.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAUDE report category
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Device description (Product Code) Rip/tear/ Discolor/ Allergy/skin Not device Improper
hole debris issue related use Mislabeled Odor Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patient Examination Glove, Specialty (LZC)........... 22 19 4 1 0 0 0 46
Radiation Attenuating Medical Glove (OPH)............ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Powder-Free Non-Natural Rubber Latex Surgeon's Gloves 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
(OPA)...............................................
Powder-Free Guayle Rubber Examination Glove (OIG).... 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Latex Patient Examination Glove (LYY)................ 6 7 29 4 0 1 1 48
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................ 28 26 36 5 1 1 1 98
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More than half of the reports (55%) related to material flaws such as
tears, discoloration, or foreign debris in the gloves. For the 36
allergic reaction reports, there was only one report connected with a
hospital visit for which the patient was ultimately monitored and
discharged. There are 5 MAUDE events from which the report narrative
does not provide a basis to infer that the device itself caused the
harm.\29\ None of the 98 reports involved a death.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ For example, there was one MAUDE incident where a user
reported suffering a third-degree burn after ``pouring boiling
nitric acid into a beaker and without warning a chemical reaction
occurred causing acid to spill onto the wrist.'' Nothing in the
report indicates the gloves themselves caused the burn or otherwise
exacerbated the burn.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 38 class II devices listed in Table 3.1 were connected to
another 539 MAUDE reports. Of those reports, 322 (59.7%) involved
device malfunctions, 71 (13.2%) involved injuries, 22 (4.1%) involved
deaths, and 124 (23%) have the event type listed as ``other'' or
``NA.'' Table 3.3 below provides the breakdown of the 539 MAUDE reports
by device type.
Table 3.3--MAUDE Report Breakdown for 38 Class II Devices in Table 3.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAUDE report category
Device description Product code -------------------------------------------------------------
Malfunction Injury Death Other NA Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meter, Peak Flow, Spirometry.... BZH............. 26 1 0 0 0 27
Monitor, Apnea, Facility Use.... FLS............. 52 9 16 9 0 86
Monitor, Apnea, Home Use........ NPF............. 34 5 2 0 0 41
Oximeter, Reprocessed........... NLF............. 49 14 0 0 2 65
Stethoscope, Electronic......... DQD............. 1 0 0 1 0 2
Defoamer, Cardiopulmonary Bypass DTP............. 3 1 0 0 0 4
Filter, Blood, Cardiotomy JOD............. 1 0 0 1 0 2
Suction Line, Cardiopulmonary
Bypass.
[[Page 4094]]
Detector, Bubble, KRL............. 33 0 0 1 10 44
Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
Cpb Check Valve, Retrograde MJJ............. 11 1 0 0 0 12
Flow, In-Line.
Sterilizer, Ethylene-Oxide Gas.. FLF............. 7 9 0 1 12 29
Cabinet, Ethylene-Oxide Gas FLI............. 0 2 0 0 0 2
Aerator.
Purifier, Air, Ultraviolet, FRA............. 1 0 0 0 0 1
Medical.
Cleaner, Air, Medical FRF............. 6 0 0 0 1 7
Recirculating.
Controller, Infusion, LDR............. 27 0 0 0 0 27
Intravascular, Electronic.
Cleaners, Medical Devices....... MDZ............. 4 0 0 1 0 5
Percutaneous, Implanted, Long- OMF............. 3 2 0 4 0 9
Term Intravascular Catheter
Accessory For Catheter Position.
N95 Respirator With ORW............. 1 0 0 0 0 1
Antimicrobial/Antiviral Agent
For Use By The General Public
In Public Health Medical
Emergencies.
Two Or More Sterilant Sterilizer PJJ............. 0 6 0 0 0 6
High Level Disinfection OUJ............. 1 1 0 1 0 3
Reprocessing Instrument For
Ultrasonic Transducers, Mist.
Gown, Patient................... FYB............. 0 0 1 0 0 1
Surgical Mask With Antimicrobial/ OUK............. 0 1 0 0 0 1
Antiviral Agent.
Cerebral Oximeter............... QEM............. 1 1 0 0 0 2
Device, Sleep Assessment........ LEL............. 4 0 0 0 0 4
Standard Polysomnograph With OLV............. 7 2 0 0 0 9
Electroencephalograph.
Source Localization Software For OLX............. 1 1 0 0 0 2
Electroencephalograph Or
Magnetoencephalograph.
Automatic Event Detection OLZ............. 0 1 0 0 0 1
Software For Polysomnograph
With Electroencephalograph.
Amplitude-Integrated OMA............. 1 0 0 0 0 1
Electroencephalograph.
Automatic Event Detection OMB............. 1 0 0 1 2 4
Software For Full-Montage
Electroencephalograph.
Burst Suppression Detection ORT............. 1 0 0 0 0 1
Software For
Electroencephalograph.
Monitor, Heart Rate, Fetal, HEL............. 9 2 1 0 0 12
Ultrasonic.
Transducer, Ultrasonic, HGL............. 0 6 0 0 0 6
Obstetric.
Uterine Electromyographic OSP............. 1 1 1 0 0 3
Monitor.
Tonometer, Ac-Powered........... HKX............. 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tonometer, Manual............... HKY............. 3 4 0 1 0 8
Automated Digital Image Manual OEO............. 1 0 0 0 0 1
Interpretation Microscope.
System, X-Ray, Tomographic...... IZF............. 31 1 1 1 1 35
Analyzer, Medical Image......... MYN............. 1 0 0 0 0 1
C-Arm Fluoroscopic X-Ray System. RCC............. 0 0 0 1 72 73
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... ................ 322 71 22 23 101 539
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An additional 32 devices had from 1 to 32 reports in MAUDE after
the PHE began and anywhere from 1 to 78 reports in MAUDE from November
1, 2010 to the start of the PHE. These devices are shown in Table 4.1
below.
Table 4.1--Review Devices with MAUDE Reports Before and After PHE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAUDE events
Section in MAUDE events Post-PHE to
Device description Device class Product code 21 CFR November 1, November 30,
2010 to PHE 2020
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vinyl Patient Examination Glove. I............... LYZ............ 880.6250 40 1
Mechanical Ventilator........... II.............. ONZ............ 868.5895 2 1
Cannula, Arterial, II.............. NCP............ 870.4210 6 1
Cardiopulmonary Bypass (Cpb),
Embolism Protection.
Dual Lumen Ecmo Cannula......... II.............. PZS............ 870.4100 2 4
Respirator, N95, For Use By The II.............. NZJ............ 880.6260 1 1
General Public In Public Health
Medical Emergencies.
Sterilizer Automated Loading II.............. PEC............ 880.6880 8 1
System.
Infusion Safety Management II.............. PHC............ 880.5725 6 1
Software.
Gown, Isolation, Surgical....... II.............. FYC............ 878.4040 12 1
Non-Normalizing Quantitative II.............. OLT............ 882.1400 12 1
Electroencephalograph Software.
Monitor, Ultrasonic, Fetal...... II.............. KNG............ 884.2660 16 2
Whole Slide Imaging System...... II.............. PSY............ 864.3700 2 1
Oxygenator, Long Term Support II.............. BZG............ 868.1840 10 1
Greater Than 6 Hours.
Transmitters And Receivers, II.............. BZQ............ 868.2375 38 8
Electrocardiograph, Telephone.
[[Page 4095]]
Extracorporeal System For Long- II.............. NFB............ 868.5905 24 1
Term Respiratory/
Cardiopulmonary Failure.
Catheter, Percutaneous, II.............. NHJ............ 868.5905 18 2
Intraspinal, Short Term.
Implanted Subcutaneous II.............. NHK............ 868.5905 78 1
Securement Catheter.
Subcutaneous Implanted Apheresis II.............. QAV............ 868.5454 0 1
Port.
Non-Coring (Huber) Needle....... II.............. BYS............ 870.4100 0 1
Administrations Sets With II.............. DXH............ 870.2920 18 5
Neuraxial Connectors.
Port & Catheter, Implanted, II.............. QJZ............ 870.4100 0 12
Subcutaneous, Intraventricular.
Hood, Surgical.................. II.............. MAJ............ 868.5120 17 1
N95 Respirator With II.............. OKC............ 880.5970 16 1
Antimicrobial/Antiviral Agent.
Reduced- Montage Standard II.............. PTD............ 880.5965 40 32
Electroencephalograph.
Monitor, Uterine Contraction, II.............. PTI............ 880.5570 36 10
External (For Use In Clinic).
Coil, Magnetic Resonance, II.............. PWH............ 880.5440 0 5
Specialty.
Solid State Fluoroscopic X-Ray II.............. LKG............ 882.5550 20 1
Imager.
Oxygenator, Long Term Support II.............. FXY............ 878.4040 20 1
Greater Than 6 Hours.
Transmitters And Receivers, II.............. ONT............ 878.4040 0 1
Electrocardiograph, Telephone.
Extracorporeal System For Long- II.............. OMC............ 882.1400 0 1
Term Respiratory/
Cardiopulmonary Failure.
Catheter, Percutaneous, II.............. HFM............ 884.2720 13 1
Intraspinal, Short Term.
Implanted Subcutaneous II.............. MOS............ 892.1000 72 1
Securement Catheter.
Subcutaneous Implanted Apheresis II.............. QHY............ 892.1650 0 1
Port.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 4.2 presents the devices in Table 4.1 broken down by type of
MAUDE. Of the 630 MAUDE reports analyzed, the majority (383 or 60.7%)
involved product malfunctions with a limited number connected to death
(24 or 3.8%).
Table 4.2--Review Devices in Table 4.1 by MAUDE Report
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAUDE Reports
Device descriptions Device class Product code -------------------------------------------------------------
Malfunction Death Injury Other NA Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vinyl Patient Examination Glove......... I...................... LYZ.................... 20 0 19 1 1 41
Mechanical Ventilator................... II..................... ONZ.................... 1 1 1 0 0 3
Cannula, Arterial, Cardiopulmonary II..................... NCP.................... 2 0 5 0 0 7
Bypass (Cpb), Embolism Protection.
Dual Lumen Ecmo Cannula................. II..................... PZS.................... 1 1 4 0 0 6
Respirator, N95, For Use By The General II..................... NZJ.................... 1 0 1 0 0 2
Public In Public Health Medical
Emergencies.
Sterilizer Automated Loading System..... II..................... PEC.................... 7 0 2 0 0 9
Infusion Safety Management Software..... II..................... PHC.................... 7 0 0 0 0 7
Gown, Isolation, Surgical............... II..................... FYC.................... 12 0 1 0 0 13
Non-Normalizing Quantitative II..................... OLT.................... 11 2 0 0 0 13
Electroencephalograph Software.
Monitor, Ultrasonic, Fetal.............. II..................... KNG.................... 2 1 15 0 0 18
Whole Slide Imaging System.............. II..................... PSY.................... 2 0 1 0 0 3
Oxygenator, Long Term Support Greater II..................... BZG.................... 7 0 2 1 1 11
Than 6 Hours.
Transmitters And Receivers, II..................... BZQ.................... 38 5 3 0 0 46
Electrocardiograph, Telephone.
Extracorporeal System For Long-Term II..................... NFB.................... 11 4 9 1 0 25
Respiratory/Cardiopulmonary Failure.
Catheter, Percutaneous, Intraspinal, II..................... NHJ.................... 10 1 9 0 0 20
Short Term.
Implanted Subcutaneous Securement II..................... NHK.................... 68 4 6 0 1 79
Catheter.
Subcutaneous Implanted Apheresis Port... II..................... QAV.................... 1 0 0 0 0 1
Non-Coring (Huber) Needle............... II..................... BYS.................... 1 0 0 0 0 1
Administrations Sets With Neuraxial II..................... DXH.................... 9 1 9 0 4 23
Connectors.
Port & Catheter, Implanted, II..................... QJZ.................... 9 1 2 0 0 12
Subcutaneous, Intraventricular.
Hood, Surgical.......................... II..................... MAJ.................... 12 0 6 0 0 18
N95 Respirator With Antimicrobial/ II..................... OKC.................... 12 0 3 1 1 17
Antiviral Agent.
Reduced- Montage Standard II..................... PTD.................... 52 1 19 0 0 72
Electroencephalograph.
Monitor, Uterine Contraction, External II..................... PTI.................... 22 0 24 0 0 46
(For Use In Clinic).
Coil, Magnetic Resonance, Specialty..... II..................... PWH.................... 5 0 0 0 0 5
[[Page 4096]]
Solid State Fluoroscopic X-Ray Imager... II..................... LKG.................... 16 1 4 0 0 21
Oxygenator, Long Term Support Greater II..................... FXY.................... 19 0 2 0 0 21
Than 6 Hours.
Transmitters And Receivers, II..................... ONT.................... 0 0 1 0 0 1
Electrocardiograph, Telephone.
Extracorporeal System For Long-Term II..................... OMC.................... 1 0 0 0 0 1
Respiratory/Cardiopulmonary Failure.
Catheter, Percutaneous, Intraspinal, II..................... HFM.................... 10 1 3 0 0 14
Short Term.
Implanted Subcutaneous Securement II..................... MOS.................... 13 0 52 7 1 73
Catheter.
Subcutaneous Implanted Apheresis Port... II..................... QHY.................... 1 0 0 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................. 383 24 203 11 9 630
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Exemption from 510(k) Premarket Notification Requirement
A. Class I Devices
Section 510(l)(2)(A)-(B) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 360(l)(2)(A)-
(B), provides that ``the Secretary shall identify through publication
in the Federal Register, any type of class I device that the Secretary
determines no longer requires a report under subsection (k) to provide
reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness'' and that ``[u]pon
such publication--each type of class I device so identified shall be
exempt from the requirement for a report under subsection (k); and the
classification regulation applicable to each such type of device shall
be deemed amended to incorporate such exemption.''
In view of the complete lack of or de minimis number of adverse
events in MAUDE following FDA's waiver of the premarket notification
requirement for the class I devices listed in Tables 2, 3.1, and 4.1,
the Department has concluded that the premarket notification
requirement is no longer required to provide reasonable assurance of
the safety and efficacy of those devices. As such, as of this Notice,
the 7 class I devices listed in Table 5 below shall be exempt from the
510(k) premarket notification requirement.
Table 5--Class I Devices Immediately Exempt from 510(k) Notification
Requirement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section in
Device description Device class Product code 21 CFR
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powder-Free Polychloroprene I............ OPC.......... 880.6250
Patient Examination Glove.
Patient Examination Glove, I............ LZC.......... 880.6250
Specialty.
Radiation Attenuating Medical I............ OPH.......... 880.6250
Glove.
Powder-Free Non-Natural I............ OPA.......... 878.4460
Rubber Latex Surgeon''s
Gloves.
Powder-Free Guayle Rubber I............ OIG.......... 880.6250
Examination Glove.
Latex Patient Examination I............ LYY.......... 880.6250
Glove.
Vinyl Patient Examination I............ LYZ.......... 880.6250
Glove.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Class II Devices
Section 510(m)(2) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 360(m)(2), provides
that, after a 60-calendar-day-notice comment period, ``the Secretary
may exempt a class II device from the requirement to submit a report
under subsection (k) . . . if the Secretary determines that such report
is not necessary to assure the safety and effectiveness of the
device.'' Within 120 days of publication, ``the Secretary shall publish
an order in the Federal Register that sets forth the final
determination of the Secretary regarding the exemption of the device
that was the subject of the notice.'' Given the lack of any adverse
event reports in MAUDE for class II and the unclassified medical
devices listed in Table 2, and the lack of non-death-related adverse
event reports for class II devices in Tables 3.3 and 4.2, the
Department has determined that 510(k) premarket notification for the 84
class II devices and the unclassified device listed in Table 6 below is
no longer necessary to assure the safety and effectiveness of those
devices.
Table 6--Class II Devices and Unclassified Devices Proposed Exempt from
510(k) Requirement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section in
Device description Device class Product code 21 CFR
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ventilator, Continuous, II........... NQY.......... 868.5895
Minimal Ventilatory Support,
Home Use.
Airway Monitoring System..... II........... OQU.......... 868.5730
Impedance Measuring Device II........... PNV.......... 868.1840
Utilizing Oscillation
Techniques.
Gauge, Pressure, Coronary, II........... DXS.......... 870.4310
Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
Valve, Pressure Relief, II........... MNJ.......... 870.4400
Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
Oximeter, Tissue Saturation, II........... NMD.......... 870.2700
Reprocessed.
Multivariate Vital Signs II........... PLB.......... 870.2300
Index.
Electrocardiograph Software II........... QDA.......... 870.2345
For Over-The-Counter Use.
Sterilizer, Dry Heat......... II........... KMH.......... 880.6870
Check Valve, Retrograde Flow II........... MJF.......... 880.5440
(In-Line).
[[Page 4097]]
Intravascular Administration II........... OKL.......... 880.5445
Set, Automated Air Removal
System.
Neuraxial Administration Set-- II........... PYR.......... 880.5440
Intrathecal Delivery.
High Level Disinfection II........... PSW.......... 892.1570
Reprocessing Instrument For
Ultrasonic Transducers,
Liquid.
Pediatric/Child Facemask..... II........... OXZ.......... 878.4040
Normalizing Quantitative II........... OLU.......... 882.1400
Electroencephalograph
Software.
Computerized Cognitive II........... PKQ.......... 882.1470
Assessment Aid.
Physiological Signal Based II........... POS.......... 882.1580
Seizure Monitoring System.
Computerized Behavioral II........... PWE.......... 882.5801
Therapy Device For
Psychiatric Disorders.
Monitor, Phonocardiographic, II........... HFP.......... 884.2640
Fetal.
Monitor, Cardiac, Fetal...... II........... KXN.......... 884.2600
Digital Pathology Display.... II........... PZZ.......... 864.3700
Digital Pathology Image II........... QKQ.......... 864.3700
Viewing And Management
Software.
System, Imaging, Holography, II........... NCS.......... 892.1550
Acoustic.
Lung Computed Tomography II........... OEB.......... 892.2050
System, Computer-Aided
Detection.
Chest X-Ray Computer Aided II........... OMJ.......... 892.2050
Detection.
Computer-Assisted Diagnostic II........... POK.......... 892.2060
Software For Lesions
Suspicious For Cancer.
Radiological Computer- II........... QAS.......... 892.2080
Assisted Triage And
Notification Software.
Radiological Computer II........... QBS.......... 892.2090
Assisted Detection/Diagnosis
Software For Fracture.
Radiological Computer II........... QDQ.......... 892.2090
Assisted Detection/Diagnosis
Software For Lesions
Suspicious For Cancer.
Radiological Computer- II........... QFM.......... 892.2080
Assisted Prioritization
Software For Lesions.
X-Ray Angiographic Imaging II........... QHA.......... 892.1600
Based Coronary Vascular
Simulation Software Device.
Automated Radiological Image II........... QIH.......... 892.2050
Processing Software.
Image Acquisition And/Or II........... QJU.......... 892.2100
Optimization Guided By
Artificial Intelligence.
Apparatus, Vestibular Unclassified. LXV.......... N/A
Analysis.
Meter, Peak Flow, Spirometry. II........... BZH.......... 868.1860
Oximeter, Reprocessed........ II........... NLF.......... 870.2700
Stethoscope, Electronic...... II........... DQD.......... 870.1875
Defoamer, Cardiopulmonary II........... DTP.......... 870.4230
Bypass.
Filter, Blood, Cardiotomy II........... JOD.......... 870.4270
Suction Line,
Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
Detector, Bubble, II........... KRL.......... 870.4205
Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
Cpb Check Valve, Retrograde II........... MJJ.......... 870.4400
Flow, In-Line.
Sterilizer, Ethylene-Oxide II........... FLF.......... 880.6860
Gas.
Cabinet, Ethylene-Oxide Gas II........... FLI.......... 880.6100
Aerator.
Purifier, Air, Ultraviolet, II........... FRA.......... 880.6500
Medical.
Cleaner, Air, Medical II........... FRF.......... 880.5045
Recirculating.
Controller, Infusion, II........... LDR.......... 880.5725
Intravascular, Electronic.
Cleaners, Medical Devices.... II........... MDZ.......... 880.6992
Percutaneous, Implanted, Long- II........... OMF.......... 880.5970
Term Intravascular Catheter
Accessory For Catheter
Position.
N95 Respirator With II........... ORW.......... 880.6260
Antimicrobial/Antiviral
Agent For Use By The General
Public In Public Health
Medical Emergencies.
Two Or More Sterilant II........... PJJ.......... 880.6860
Sterilizer.
High Level Disinfection II........... OUJ.......... 892.1570
Reprocessing Instrument For
Ultrasonic Transducers, Mist.
Surgical Mask With II........... OUK.......... 878.4040
Antimicrobial/Antiviral
Agent.
Cerebral Oximeter............ II........... QEM.......... 870.2700
Device, Sleep Assessment..... II........... LEL.......... 882.5050
Standard Polysomnograph With II........... OLV.......... 882.1400
Electroencephalograph.
Source Localization Software II........... OLX.......... 882.1400
For Electroencephalograph Or
Magnetoencephalograph.
Automatic Event Detection II........... OLZ.......... 882.1400
Software For Polysomnograph
With Electroencephalograph.
Amplitude-Integrated II........... OMA.......... 882.1400
Electroencephalograph.
Automatic Event Detection II........... OMB.......... 882.1400
Software For Full-Montage
Electroencephalograph.
Burst Suppression Detection II........... ORT.......... 882.1400
Software For
Electroencephalograph.
Transducer, Ultrasonic, II........... HGL.......... 884.2960
Obstetric.
Tonometer, Ac-Powered........ II........... HKX.......... 886.1930
Tonometer, Manual............ II........... HKY.......... 886.1930
Automated Digital Image II........... OEO.......... 864.1860
Manual Interpretation
Microscope.
Analyzer, Medical Image...... II........... MYN.......... 892.2070
C-Arm Fluoroscopic X-Ray II........... RCC.......... 892.1650
System.
Cannula, Arterial, II........... NCP.......... 870.4210
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
(Cpb), Embolism Protection.
Respirator, N95, For Use By II........... NZJ.......... 880.6260
The General Public In Public
Health Medical Emergencies.
Sterilizer Automated Loading II........... PEC.......... 880.6880
System.
Infusion Safety Management II........... PHC.......... 880.5725
Software.
Gown, Isolation, Surgical.... II........... FYC.......... 878.4040
Whole Slide Imaging System... II........... PSY.......... 864.3700
Oxygenator, Long Term Support II........... BZG.......... 868.1840
Greater Than 6 Hours.
Subcutaneous Implanted II........... QAV.......... 868.5454
Apheresis Port.
Non-Coring (Huber) Needle.... II........... BYS.......... 870.4100
Hood, Surgical............... II........... MAJ.......... 868.5120
N95 Respirator With II........... OKC.......... 880.5970
Antimicrobial/Antiviral
Agent.
Monitor, Uterine Contraction, II........... PTI.......... 880.5570
External (For Use In Clinic).
Coil, Magnetic Resonance, II........... PWH.......... 880.5440
Specialty.
[[Page 4098]]
Oxygenator, Long Term Support II........... FXY.......... 878.4040
Greater Than 6 Hours.
Transmitters And Receivers, II........... ONT.......... 878.4040
Electrocardiograph,
Telephone.
Extracorporeal System For II........... OMC.......... 882.1400
Long-Term Respiratory/
Cardiopulmonary Failure.
Implanted Subcutaneous II........... MOS.......... 892.1000
Securement Catheter.
Subcutaneous Implanted II........... QHY.......... 892.1650
Apheresis Port.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Impact of Exemptions on Patient Access to Medical Devices
With this Notice, the Department is immediately exempting 7 devices
from the premarket notification requirement, and proposes to exempt an
additional 84 devices from the requirement after public comment is
closed. As noted above in Part I.A, estimates on the cost of preparing
a 510(k) submission range from $100,000 to $4 million. The exemptions
provided for and proposed under this Notice for these 91 device classes
could eliminate anywhere from $9.1 to $364 million in startup costs if
there were one new entrant into each device market. Savings could
further accrue based on each new market entrant. Instead of being costs
passed along to patients and taxpayers, these savings could be invested
in other areas such as research and development and manufacturing.
At the same time, should these waivers go into effect as proposed,
patients stand to gain more immediate access to new products that would
otherwise be required to obtain a 510(k) clearance prior to marketing.
The exemptions provided for in this Notice also conserve FDA's
scarce review resources. The COVID-19 PHE stretched FDA's review
capacity. Under this Notice, FDA's review resources can be redeployed
to review other innovative technology, to include devices designed to
mitigate the impact of COVID-19.
IV. Request for Information, Data, and Further Study
HHS' review in this Notice warrants expansion and further study.
FDA's medical device Product Code database contains 6,651 unique codes
(to include those discussed in this Notice). Of those unique codes, 157
are for class I devices that require 510(k) clearance, and 2,662 are
for class II devices that require 510(k) clearance. Applying the
$100,000 to $4 million in estimated costs for 510(k) preparation and
submission to these 2,819 devices yields approximately $281.9 million
to $11.276 billion in startup costs, assuming one new market entrant in
each of the 2,819 device classes. Further, again assuming a 90-day
review period and one new device entrant in each of the 2,819 device
classes that require 510(k) notification, FDA's current approach
creates 253,710 review days or 695.1 review years between Americans and
new devices. The question of whether the 510(k) notice is justified in
view of safety and efficacy concerns merits comprehensive analysis for
the benefit of Americans. The Department seeks public comment,
research, and analysis on whether other devices should be exempt from
the premarket notification requirement.
At a more detailed level, the Department observed internal
inconsistencies in FDA's regulation of some device classes that merit
discussion. Manual stethoscopes are exempt from the premarket
notification requirement. 21 CFR 870.1875(a)(2). Electronic
stethoscopes are also exempt, but only if the device ``is a lung sound
monitor.'' 21 CFR 870.1875(b)(2). Similarly, FDA exempts ``clinical
mercury thermometer . . . device[s] used to measure oral, rectal, or
axillary (armpit) body temperature using the thermal expansion of
mercury'' from the 510(k) premarket notification requirement. 21 CFR
880.2920. By contrast, clinical electronic thermometers which never
enter into any body orifice require 510(k) premarket notification. 21
CFR 880.2910. These apparent inconsistencies merit scientific scrutiny.
To that end, the Department seeks public comment as to whether other
inconsistencies in the medical device regulatory framework exist.
Dated: January 8, 2021.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2021-00787 Filed 1-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-26-P